Choose one of the following criminal justice concepts covered in the course to write about:
For this assignment, you must use one credible external source (e.g., academic journals, government reports, or reputable organizations) and 3–4 Sophia tutorials to support your analysis and provide evidence for the current state of the concept.
hint Avoid non-credible sources like social media or Wikipedia. Select the plus sign to see some websites that you could investigate for your external source:
When referencing this source in your response, be sure to include an in-text citation using APA format. Visit the APA citation help resource for more information.
Provide in-text citations for the Sophia tutorials. Criminologists use American Psychological Association (APA) format for their research. Here is how to format an in-text APA citation for a Sophia tutorial:
(Sophia Learning, n.d.)Your Touchstone will have four parts:
1. After selecting your topic and sources, write an introduction that, in your own words, defines and explains the chosen concept in the context of the criminal justice system (200–250 words). In the introduction, consider addressing:
2. Discuss how this concept operates in real-life situations (300–350 words). Provide examples of how this concept is applied in the criminal justice system today, considering challenges or controversies that arise.
There are many applications, but here are some things you could consider:
3. In your conclusion, reflect on the future of this concept within criminal justice (250–300 words). Consider questions such as:
4. Develop a reference page in APA format. Include evidence and information from 3–4 tutorials and from one outside source to support your responses.
Here is how to format a reference page entry for a website in APA:
Lastname, F. M. (Year, Month Date). Title of page. Site name. URLAnd here is an example:
Price, D. (2018, March 23). Laziness does not exist. Medium.Your reference entries for Sophia tutorials should use the following format:
Sophia Learning. (n.d.). Cybercrime [Hacking]. Introduction to Criminal Justice. URLReview the rubric to ensure that you understand how you will be evaluated. Also review the requirements to ensure that your Touchstone is complete.
With this assignment, you’ve broadened your understanding and analysis of a concept within the criminal justice system and established its real-world connections. Congrats!
| Advanced (100%) | Proficient (85%) | Acceptable (75%) | Needs Improvement (50%) | Non-Performance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IntroductionClear definition and explanation of the chosen concept within the criminal justice system. (25%) | Provides a comprehensive and clear introduction to the concept. Effectively defines the concept and explains its significance within the criminal justice system. The introduction is well organized and fully addresses the topic with rich context and relevant details. | Clearly defines the concept and describes its role within the criminal justice system. The introduction is organized, but it may lack some depth or additional context. The explanation is accurate but could be more thorough. | Provides a basic definition and description of the concept but lacks depth or may miss some key aspects. The introduction may feel somewhat incomplete or generalized. | The introduction is unclear or lacks sufficient details. The definition of the concept may be vague or inaccurate, and the explanation of its significance is weak or missing. | Fails to define or explain the concept. The introduction is missing, unclear, or does not adequately introduce the topic. |
Real-World ApplicationThere is a detailed analysis of the concept’s application in practice, supported by real-world examples. (30%) | Provides a thorough and insightful analysis of how the concept is applied in real-world situations. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the concept's real-world implications with multiple, specific examples. Includes challenges or controversies that are relevant and well explained. | Gives a clear analysis of the concept’s application with at least one specific example. Shows a good understanding of the real-world implications but may lack depth or additional examples. Mentions challenges or controversies, but with less detail. | Provides a basic explanation of how the concept is applied in real life but may lack specific examples or sufficient detail. Challenges or controversies are mentioned, but the analysis is superficial or underdeveloped. | Provides a general explanation of the concept's application but lacks specific real-world examples. The analysis is vague, and challenges or controversies are not addressed or are unclear. | Fails to adequately address the real-world application of the concept. No relevant examples or discussion of challenges/controversies. |
ConclusionConclusion summarizes the essential elements of the assignment and makes a statement about the future of the topic. (25%) | The conclusion fully summarizes each of the above rubric components and makes an appropriate statement about the future of the topic. | The conclusion generally summarizes the above rubric components and generally makes a statement about the future of the topic. | The conclusion summarizes most of the above rubric components; however, some key elements are missing and the statement about the future of the topic is ambiguous or inaccurate. | The conclusion does not summarize the essential elements of the assignment and the statement about the future of the topic is missing or inaccurately applied. | No conclusion or statement about the future of the topic is provided. |
ReferencesSources are appropriately identified and integrated. (10%) | Evidence from four tutorials and one credible outside source is provided and cited in text and in the reference page. Proper APA formatting is used. | Evidence from three tutorials and one credible outside source is provided and cited in text and in the reference page. Proper APA formatting is used. | Evidence from two tutorials and one credible outside source is provided and cited in text and in the reference page. Errors may exist in APA formatting or in-text citations. | An attempt to cite sources is made. Serious errors in source credibility and APA formatting may exist. | No citations or references are provided. |
ConventionsSubmission follows conventions for standard written English and meets requirements. (10%) | There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization; all length and formatting requirements are met or exceeded. | There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability; length and formatting requirements are nearly met. | There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability; length and formatting requirements are nearly met. | There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability; length and formatting requirements are not met. | Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded. |